Our Illinois-based law firm specializes in providing exemplary service to clients seeking assistance after automotive mishaps. We take pride in our decades of experience, assisting thousands of drivers and car owners get the compensation they are due following tragic automobile accidents. Behind our success lies an unwavering dedication to understanding each client’s unique concerns and needs, advocating on their behalf with fierce determination and absolute professionalism. Whether navigating insurance claims or pursuing courtroom litigation against at-fault parties, trust us to prioritize your interests above all else. With our central focus located in Illinois, we work tirelessly to represent your rights and help you navigate with confidence through complex legal terrain. We understand that encountering a car accident can be a traumatic experience that carries severe physical pain and emotional trauma headlong into daunting realms of insurance issues and tort law. As seasoned personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, at Carlson Bier, we take up the mantle of reassurance as well as resilience on behalf of our clients. We approach each case with an unwavering commitment to deliver results tailored specifically around the circumstances arising from your unfortunate encounter. Whether it’s handling fender-benders or severe multi-vehicle pile-ups resulting in catastrophic injuries or tragic fatalities, rest assured that when you choose us, you’re getting a powerhouse ally committed to fighting tooth-and-nail for your rightfully deserved compensation. It is important to familiarize oneself with key aspects related to car accidents:• The necessity for prompt action: Following an accident, it is vital that evidence gathering begins immediately. • Understanding liability: Determining who was responsible for an accident is crucial in personal injury cases. • Compensation availability: If injured due to another party’s negligence or recklessness, one is entitled to damages covering medical bills, loss of wages due etc. • Importance of experienced representation: A practiced attorney can significantly tip the scales towards maximum compensation. Each case we handle at Carlson Bier differs uniquely depending upon its nature and severity; however always holds consistent threads concerning untangling facts and determining liability while ensuring justice served under Illinois law. Our input ranges from carefully assembling requisite documents such as police reports & medical records stemming from collisions including single-car crashes or intersection accidents – all comprising various components essential at different stages within proceedings leading towards claiming rightful compensations. Fundamentally characterized by a zealous adoration for justice, our ethos at Carlson Bier extends past merely delivering competent legal counsel. We stand firmly alongside those embroiled in life-altering ordeals brought on by car accidents – until they are rightfully recompensed for their losses, we refuse to rest. Collaborating with clients transparently and incorporating bespoke strategies implies an increased likelihood of securing maximum allowable compensation under applicable legislation. Car accidents can significantly impact one’s life – both personally and professionally. The physical pain, emotional trauma and financial hardship incurred makes obtaining fair and just compensation imperative. However, the path towards claiming it is laden with intricacies that require deft steering through Illinois’ accident laws – a challenge best met head-on by experts trained to grapple effectively with its challenges. At Carlson Bier, we consistently strive to sculpt impeccable balance between compassionate client relations juxtaposed against hard-hitting representations aimed squarely at extracting deserved compensations befitting victims of car accidents. Skilfully navigating avenues promising maximum claims while tangibly offsetting burdens endured is something accomplished daily here- another day at our office means another client’s distress mitigated. It’s easy to feel overwhelmed after a car accident but remember you don’t have to face this challenging time alone. An experienced lawyer from Carlson Bier is ready to step in and fight aggressively for your rights, aiming tirelessly for the outcome most favorable to your cause while maintaining adherence towards all provisions stipulated under Illinois Law. We encourage you not just trust us but verify us: stringent transparency and rigorous determination characterizes commitments undertaken upon partnering with Carson Bier representing you. Don’t decelerate on your journey towards rightful justice owing to a lack of clarity surrounding complexities shrouding personal injury intricacies resultant from car accidents within Illinois; take advantage of expertise available here now simply waiting for command issuance prompting seamless execution. Please click on the button below allowing free access validating exactly how much does your case sums up worth- we believe fairness is the only competent judge steering justice towards its rightful destination, let’s ensure that here right now. Carlson Bier, personal injury lawyers based in Illinois is ready and capable to guide you through these tumultuous times. With us at your side, you are never alone in your journey towards justice. CCC Servs. , Inc. , 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N. E. 3d 61Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J. , granted the insurer’s motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed. Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J. , held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured’s damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist’s declaratory judgment action. Affirmed in part and reversed in part. Maier v. CC Servs. , Inc. , 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N. E. 3d 795Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver’s policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured’s damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured’s policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J. , granted the insurer’s motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed. The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy’s requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured’s attorney to the insurer wasn’t a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court’s decision was affirmed. Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co. , 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-UHolding: The circuit court’s order that granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed. Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-UHolding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant’s automotive insurance policy. Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N. E. 3d 291In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player’s stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer’s four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities. Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co. , Inc. , 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N. E. 3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)Holding: The circuit court’s order that denied plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court’s order that denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed. Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N. E. 3d 911Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers’ compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J. , entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed. Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J. , held that:1 employer’s medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable. Affirmed. Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-UHolding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee’s individual farm insurance policy. Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-UHolding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy. Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-UHolding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action. Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc. , 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N. E. 2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J. , entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J. , 358 Ill. App. 3d 880, 295 Ill. Dec. 665, 833 N. E. 2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted. Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J. , held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc. , 294 Ill. App. 3d 801, 229 Ill. Dec. 20, 690 N. E. 2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur’s Opera House, Inc. , 296 Ill. App. 3d 1011, 230 Ill. Dec. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor. Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number. Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit. Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it. Contact a car accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary. What are my rights as a car accident victim in Chicago? As a car accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages. File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident. Have your case heard by a jury. What types of damages can I recover in a car accident lawsuit in Chicago? In a car accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy. Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries. Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries. What types of damages can I recover in a car accident lawsuit in Chicago? In a car accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy. Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries. Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries. Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your vehicle. Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct. How long do I have to file a car accident lawsuit in Chicago? The statute of limitations for car accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing your phone number, you agree to receive text messages from Carlson Bier Associates LLC. Message and data rates may apply.