Carlson Bier is your go-to specialists for superb advocacy and justice pursuit. Over time, we’ve defended numerous Edgewood residents involved in auto accidents by navigating through complex legal requirements related to compensation claims with unmatched acumen. Our firm boasts specialized knowledge that makes claiming damages due to auto accidents easier and effective. We blend expertise and compassion creating tailored strategies that advocate for maximum compensation under Illinois law–a testament of our dedication towards equitable justice delivery. When you choose Carlson Bier, you’re choosing detail-oriented lawyers who can dissect even the most convoluted aspects involving car accident cases in Edgewood. Carleton Bier’s proven track record enhances courtroom confidence while ensuring clients receive rightful settlements – earning us unprecedented respect within Illinois’s dynamic personal injury arena . We aim at providing formidable support essential to offsetting medical bills or compensating lost income after any traumatizing ordeal caused by car wrecks. Trust us as your preferred choice whenever seeking a reliable path towards recovery. With extensive knowledge of traffic laws and expertise in negotiating with insurance firms, our team ensures that your rights are protected and justice is served. Dealing with an accident can be traumatizing enough; therefore, we take all strides necessary to ease your legal journey as you recuperate. Our distinguished practice seeks to provide comprehensive educational insights about car accidents — not only for our clients but also for anyone navigating through post-accident repercussions. Every year, thousands of motorists become unfortunate victims of negligent driving resulting in an array of injuries from minor scrapes to grave physical damage or loss of life. Understanding these nuances associated with car accidents extends beyond comprehending their myriad causes such as reckless driving, drunk driving, poor weather conditions or vehicle defects among others. What spurs these incidents shape the consequential effects on victims which might necessitate long-term medical treatment, psychological therapy or result in loss of income due to inability to resume work immediately. Under Illinois law provisions falling within ‘The Motor Vehicle Code’, individuals who endure harm due to another driver’s negligence could claim damages covering medical expenses incurred during treatment along with reimbursement for repair costs if the vehicle got damaged. Also included are compensations pertaining to lost wages during recovery period and general damages causing pain along with mental distress—provided evidence validates the claims’ explanation on incident occurrence basis. Some critical points you need to remember when faced with car accidents include:• Report the incident: Immediately notify law enforcement officers about the collision detail. • Seek immediate medical care: Even minor injuries may subsequently develop into severe health complications. • Document evidence: Capture good-quality photos or videos at the accident scene highlighting visible injuries and property damage. • Never admit fault: Let official investigations determine who was responsible for the accident manifestation. • Notify your insurer promptly: Delayed reporting might give them a reason to deny your claim substantiation. Handling car accident lawsuits requires the deftness of experienced personal injury attorneys such as Carlson Bier’s experts, proficient at deciphering the intricate legalese surrounding cases like these. We take an empathetic approach towards understanding our clients’ experiences and their emotional turmoil when combating legal nuances after experiencing traumatic accidents—something impersonal larger firms tend to overlook while prioritising case volumes over individualistic client consideration. Our team dives deeper into investigating the accident particulars, working closely with medical professionals to understand better its impact on your health and even negotiating with insurance companies if necessary. Our aim is straightforward: minimise your stress during recovery while we rigorously fight for your justified compensation. Irrespective of whether you were a driver or passenger during the incident, or even walking nearby when it occurred—our committed lawyers are equipped to assist in concluding whether pursuing a lawsuit is plausible depending on each unique situation reflected by evidence presentation and law interpretation which varies per case circumstances. If you’re uncertain about what steps to take next or how much compensation could be contestable under Illinois law within your specific circumstance—it is crucial to consult professional legal help. The process can oftentimes be complex warranting expertise only trusted personal injury attorneys like us can offer instantaneously guided by decades’ worth experience from successfully handling diverse plaintiff accident caseloads across Illinois state jurisdiction embodying high winning percentage similarly attained statewide reputation recognitions. Undeniably, each individual case holds different intrinsic value subject to varying scales of damage subjected either physically or vehicular aspect inducing subsequent trauma level additionally denoting case severity prognosis affecting overall reimbursement claim prospects within legal standards under consultation earn capacity forecast alongside future medical expenses amongst other associated expenditures needing prior addressment before lodging official claims contention compliant all regulatory mandates operational across State ambit ensuring uniform justice delivery principle observance reinforcing trust factor transparency expectation legitimacy aspects showcasing our firm’s unwavering commitment towards upholding the highest ethical standards throughout our law practice. Navigating through accident aftermath shouldn’t have to be an overwhelming path walked alone—seek guidance, not just any consultation, but expert evaluation that safeguards your interests. We invite you to leverage our dynamic interactive platform that offers a distinct feature: ascertain prospective claim amount concerning your personal injury accident case by simply clicking on the button below and answering some straightforward questions compiled in consultation with our experienced lawyers aligning accurate approximation expectations. CCC Servs. , Inc. , 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N. E. 3d 61Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J. , granted the insurer’s motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed. Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J. , held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured’s damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist’s declaratory judgment action. Affirmed in part and reversed in part. Maier v. CC Servs. , Inc. , 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N. E. 3d 795Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver’s policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured’s damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured’s policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J. , granted the insurer’s motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed. The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy’s requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured’s attorney to the insurer wasn’t a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court’s decision was affirmed. Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co. , 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-UHolding: The circuit court’s order that granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed. Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-UHolding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant’s automotive insurance policy. Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N. E. 3d 291In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player’s stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer’s four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities. Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co. , Inc. , 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N. E. 3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)Holding: The circuit court’s order that denied plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court’s order that denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed. Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N. E. 3d 911Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers’ compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J. , entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed. Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J. , held that:1 employer’s medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable. Affirmed. Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-UHolding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee’s individual farm insurance policy. Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-UHolding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy. Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-UHolding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action. Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc. , 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N. E. 2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J. , entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J. , 358 Ill. App. 3d 880, 295 Ill. Dec. 665, 833 N. E. 2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted. Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J. , held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc. , 294 Ill. App. 3d 801, 229 Ill. Dec. 20, 690 N. E. 2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur’s Opera House, Inc. , 296 Ill. App. 3d 1011, 230 Ill. Dec. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor. Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number. Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit. Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it. Contact a car accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary. What are my rights as a car accident victim in Chicago? As a car accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages. File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident. Have your case heard by a jury. What types of damages can I recover in a car accident lawsuit in Chicago? In a car accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy. Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries. Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries. What types of damages can I recover in a car accident lawsuit in Chicago? In a car accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy. Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries. Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries. Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your vehicle. Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct. How long do I have to file a car accident lawsuit in Chicago? The statute of limitations for car accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing your phone number, you agree to receive text messages from Carlson Bier Associates LLC. Message and data rates may apply.