The victim tells one version of events, and the fault driver tells another. This is because there is a tendency for parties to a lawsuit to lie and only state facts that favor their case. Thus, it’s no surprise that in civil claims where proof is on a preponderance of the evidence, the person who backs their claim with proof wins. Also, their lawyer may advise them to deny your version of events if they sense you have no evidence to back your claim. In a personal injury trial, the fault driver lies about how the auto accident happened in court, the jury will determine their credibility. Without corroboration, the jury will think both parties’ testimonies are biased, and they might be right. This is where neutral witnesses come in. Thus, always get the witnesses’ names, phone numbers, and addresses before leaving the crash scene. In auto accident cases, this includes damage to the vehicles, photographs of the accident scene, and video footage. Most times, physical evidence shows who the fault party is, thereby ending the back-and-forth arguments between parties. …