Simple cases with clear liability and documented damages achieve higher success rates than complex multi-party litigation. Single-defendant rear-end collisions prove easier than chain-reaction accidents requiring fault allocation among multiple parties. Cases involving technical evidence like product defects or medical malpractice require expensive experts potentially reducing net recovery. Long treatment periods complicate cases but can increase values when properly documented throughout recovery. Multiple insurance policies or coverage disputes add complexity but might provide additional recovery sources. Simple soft tissue injuries resolve more predictably than traumatic brain injuries requiring lifetime care projections. Complex cases benefit most from experienced attorneys with resources to properly develop evidence and retain qualified experts. Success often depends on breaking complex issues into understandable components juries can evaluate systematically.